Chaplinsky V New Hampshire The Chaplinsky Test

Facts of the Case
Chaplinsky, a Jehovah's Witness, called a city marshal a "God-damned racketeer" and "a damned fascist" in a public place. He was arrested and convicted under a state law for violating a breach of the peace.

Issue
Does the application of the statute violate Chaplinsky's freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment?

Conclusion
No. Some forms of expressionamong them obscenity and fighting wordsdo not convey ideas and thus are not subject to First Amendment protection. In this case, Chaplinsky uttered fighting words, i.e., words that "inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace."

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License